Recommendation workflows
Agricultural recommendation workflows built for PCA teams
Replace email and PDF templates with a consistent system to write, review, send, and track pesticide, fertilizer, nutrient, and field-work recommendations across growers, fields, and crops.
Why spreadsheets break down
Recommendation workflows outgrow email and templates when teams and grower volume scale.
Disconnected drafting tools
Recommendations are drafted in email, PDF, and templates with no shared structure.
No shared history
When advisors are out, teams cannot quickly answer what was applied or recommended.
Slow finalize cycles
Back-and-forth delays recommendations before they reach growers or applicators.
Inconsistent formatting
Different advisors on the same team produce different recommendation formats.
Recommendation workflow from draft to delivery
Consistent formatting with searchable history across your advisory team.
- Grower, field, and crop context before writing
- Team review before recommendations go out
- Searchable history by season and grower
Draft → Review → Send → Track
The recommendation lifecycle PCA teams need.
Draft
Build recommendations with grower, field, and crop context.
Review
Finalize with your team before sending to growers or applicators.
Send
Deliver clear field instructions with consistent formatting.
Track
Store searchable recommendation history by season and status.
Built for crop advisor teams
Pesticide recommendations
Draft with product rates and field instructions.
Fertilizer & nutrient
Support nutrient and fertilizer recommendation types.
Field-work recs
Track field-work and operational recommendations.
Team review
Review and finalize before delivery.
Grower context
Linked grower, field, and crop data.
Status tracking
See draft, pending, and sent status.
Searchable history
Find past recommendations by grower or season.
Consistent formatting
Standard templates across your advisory team.
Email & PDF templates vs. United Tracking Systems
Email, PDF & templates
- Recommendations drafted in disconnected tools
- No shared history when advisors are unavailable
- Inconsistent formatting across team members
- Manual tracking of sent and pending status
United Tracking Systems
- Structured recommendations with grower context
- Searchable history by grower, field, and season
- Team review workflow before delivery
- Consistent formatting across advisors
Example workflow
PCA team recommendation standardization
A crop advisory team drafted pesticide and fertilizer recommendations across email, PDF templates, and individual advisor formats. Growers called asking what was applied last season, and covering advisors could not quickly find prior recommendations.
Outcome: The team now writes, reviews, and sends recommendations from one system with searchable history. Grower inquiries are answered from structured records instead of email searches, and formatting is consistent across advisors.
Related paths
Frequently asked questions
What recommendation types are supported?
Falcon Crop Advisor supports pesticide, fertilizer, nutrient, and field-work recommendation types with grower, field, and crop context.
Can multiple advisors on a team review before sending?
Yes. Recommendations go through a review and finalize step before delivery to growers or applicators.
Is there searchable recommendation history?
Yes. Past recommendations are searchable by grower, field, crop, and season — so covering advisors can quickly answer grower questions.
Is Falcon Crop Advisor available now?
Falcon Crop Advisor is in early development. Request an invite to help shape the product and get early access when available.
Does this integrate with farm record systems?
Falcon is designed to work alongside Agri Tracking Systems for growers who need both farm records and recommendation workflows in connected systems.
Schedule a Recommendation Workflow Review
Tell us about your PCA team size, grower base, and recommendation types. We will walk through the workflow that fits your practice.